• Home
  • About PI
  • Sermon Resources
    • Biblical Resources
    • Theology
    • Apologetics
    • About Preaching
  • Sermons
    • Historical American Sermons
    • Patristic Sermons
      • Festal Sermons
        • Nativity of Theotokos
        • Holy Cross
        • Entrance of Theotokos
        • Christmas
        • Theophany
        • Meeting of Christ
        • Annunciation
        • Palm Sunday
        • Ascension
        • Pentecost
        • Transfiguration
        • Dormition of Theotokos
      • Lenten Sermons
        • Triumph of Orthodoxy
        • St. Gregory Palamas
        • Veneration of Cross
        • St. John Climacus
        • St. Mary of Egypt
      • Paschal Sermons
  • Webmaster Resources
  • Preachers Institute Store
  • Bible Challenges

PREACHERS INSTITUTE

You are here: Home / Old Testament Challenge / The Four Senses of Scripture

September 15, 2015 By Fr. John A. Peck

The Four Senses of Scripture

The Four Senses of Scripture

by Fr. John A. Peck

This article is made up from Chapters of my books, Called To Serve: A Basic Bible Survey for Orthodox Christians, and Interpreting the Bible the Orthodox Way: Learning to See the Bible with the Mind of the Spirit.

On the Four Senses of Scripture

When we look at the Bible, we do realize that multitudes of souls have read these works, and come up with very divergent understandings of what the Bible is saying. We, however, want to avoid novelty in our interpretation, and see things with the eye of the Spirit, in the mind of the Church; that is, the way the Church has always seen them.

St. John Cassian expresses the mind of the Church with precision and clarity, and identifies four senses or kind of Biblical interpretation. These four senses have been the Church’s mind about the Scriptures from the time of the Apostles!

Here they are. 

1. The Literal sense

2. The Spiritual sense

I. The Typological sense
II. The Moral sense
III. The Eschatological sense

There are fancier and more technical words for these commonly used by scholars, but you don’t need to know those right now.

THE LITERAL SENSE

The Literal sense is what the author wrote, and what he plainly meant by what he wrote.

Metaphors are a part of the literal sense. For example, when St. John writes that Jesus says “I am the Vine…” He does not mean that Jesus is saying He is literally a plant. When the Bible records Jesus saying “I am the door”, no one seriously believes Jesus is saying He is a piece of wood with a handle and latch. He means that this language is a symbol for the reality. He is a vine, in the sense that we get our life from Him, as a branch does from it’s parent vine. He is a door in the sense that to get to the Father, we must go through Him.

RELATED  One Day To Go: Old Testament Challenge

All other senses of Scripture depend on the literal sense. That is, they are grounded entirely in the fact that the literal sense is true, and that the Biblical persons and events were real.

How can that be? 

Because we are interpreting the actions, not the ‘words’ of Scripture in the literal sense. Without them there would be no end to the allegorizing, and symbolizing of Biblical writings and events. It is the acts and actions which we are interpreting. 

The next three belong to the spiritual sense of Scripture.

THE TYPOLOGICAL SENSE

The Typological sense is the sense that refers to Christ in types, or prefigurements. We see these everywhere in the Old Testament. St. Paul even uses the word ‘type,’ in two of his letters.

• Romans 5:14

“Adam was a type of Christ…”

• 1 Corinthians 10:6

“Things that happened in the desert to Israel during the Exodus are types for Christians.”

Memorize these two now. The word type means a mark, or imprint, as one would leave from a blow, like a handprint.

THE MORAL SENSE

The Moral sense refers to the personal, moral and spiritual interpretations which have rightly been made over the centuries. We apply these lessons to ourselves, and they teach us very specific things about the spiritual life in Christ.

A good example is Psalm 137:9, which says

“Blessed is he who takes your little ones, and dashes them against a stone.”

Taken literally and physically, this is horrific, but in the moral sense, ‘little ones’ means ‘little sins’, sins which have only begun and have not gained strength. Blessed is he who destroys them by dashing them against the Rock of our salvation – our Lord Jesus Christ. Other examples of the moral sense can be seen in a multitude of our liturgical texts, and especially in the Penitential Canon of St. Andrew of Crete, which you can hear during the first week of Lent in any Orthodox Church.

RELATED  Are You Ready?

THE ESCHATOLOGICAL SENSE

The Eschatological sense simply means the interpretation of Scripture as pertains to the end times. This is not always what you may think, and not limited to the books of Daniel or Revelation. A common example of all of the four senses of Scripture can be seen in the Biblical city of Jerusalem.

In the literal sense, Jerusalem is a real city in Israel, the capital of Israel. It is mentioned in the Biblical text as a city which really existed. It even exists to this very day.

In the typological sense, Jerusalem is the Church. It is the city on a hill, illuminating the whole world with its holiness and truth. It is the new, True Israel.

In the moral sense, Jerusalem is the soul of the believer, the interior city of the King of Glory.

In the eschatological sense, Jerusalem is the heavenly kingdom in all its splendor: the heavenly Jerusalem, our true homeland.

Notice, the modern city of Jerusalem does not figure at all in our interpretation – this may be bad news for end times ministries, but that’s the reality of Orthodox Biblical interpretation.

Finally, one last point. It is important for us to remember that the spiritual sense of Scripture depends entirely on the literal sense. That is, the spiritual sense comes from the facts presented in Scripture, not the words.

Without the foundation of the literal sense, mythical and pointless allegorizing would have no end.

And usually does.

Want to read more? Pick up the Workbook this article is taken from.

RELATED  The Final Countdown... The Last Day

Called To Serve: A Basic Bible Survey for Orthodox Christians

Don’t forget, as St. Peter wrote in 2 Peter 1:20;

“Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.”

The place to hear the proper interpretation of the Church’s Scriptures is – surprise – the Church. 

 

Likewise, Preachers Institute has covered this in some of our articles in the past.

AND this one is a must read, Adam, Ralph, Moses and Man, by Fr. Patrick Reardon.

Filed Under: Old Testament Challenge, Peck, John A. Fr. Tagged With: four senses of Scripture, Old Testament Challenge

About Fr. John A. Peck

Director of the Preachers Institute, priest in the Orthodox Church in America, award-winning graphic designer and media consultant, and non-profit administrator.
Blog; Facebook;Twitter

Preachers Institute

Recent Posts

  • Approaches to God: East and West
  • Is God a Fool?
  • It’s Time to Abuse the Devil
  • St. Mark of Ephesus and the Council of Florence
  • The Filioque in Brief
  • A Pagan Records the Slaughter of the Innocents by Herod
  • The Books Will Be Opened
  • The Apostle John and the First Letter of Clement to the Corinthians
  • Nothing Strikes Fear in the Person Whose Hope is in God
  • On the Plague
  • Marriage Perfection to Rival the Holiest of Monks
  • The Compilers of the Philokalia Answer the Opponents of Frequent Communion
  • The “Smoking Gun” of Non-Chalcedonian Christianity
  • Salvation of Christians Outside the Orthodox Church
  • On Moral Heresy

Preachers Institute Archives

Preachers Institute

The Online Orthodox Christian Homiletics Resource
Fr. John A. Peck, director
Phoenix, AZ

Find what you’re looking for

The Deep Dark Archives

Vocations in Orthodoxy

Good Guys Wear Blackwww.rolex-replica.me
rolex kopior

swiss replica watches store

replica rolex
watchessaleoutlet.com
best replica watch site 2021

Copyright © 2023 John A. Peck · Designed by John A. Peck